The debate brought together journalists, media researchers and other media professionals who, through their peer groups, can influence the direction of the religious debate in the media.
The event was unique: journalists and other media experts openly discussed their own perspectives on religion and spirituality. The participants included practitioners of different religions, atheists, those who have found spirituality independent of religion, as well as church-goers and non-church-goers. The dialogue brought together a diversity of voices and perspectives.
What was left for journalists to ponder?
Defining concepts is the key to constructive debate. Traditions, rituals and religion are easily confused, which can create strong emotions, confuse people into having overlapping discussions on slightly different topics, and thus build up unnecessary juxtapositions.
Journalists can contribute to constructive debate by focusing on constructive emotions. Curiosity is more valuable than clickbait headlines and blame-shifting. The media should be more courageous in looking at phenomena and people without preconceptions.
How is religion and community in schools covered in the media? The discussion identified many universal forms of holiness and spirituality, such as nature, friendship, love and aid. Can the media steer the school debate towards common values rather than emphasising differences?
The headline level plays a huge role. Headlines can either awaken curiosity and understanding or fuel outrage and juxtaposition.
We will continue the debate again in April with a new topic that has caused a stir in the media – join us!
The event was part of Vikes and Sopiva ry co- organized Moniäänisen median kuumat perunat discussion series. We are organizing three events during the spring at the Media Museum and Archive Merkki.
The next discussion will take place on Tuesday 8 April from 17-19. Follow our communication and join us in comprehending together!
